Celebrity Couples · 5 min read

Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt Started With Sweatpants and Four Hours of Talking

Their first date barely needed a television. Now, between parenthood and drive-through stops, their story offers a more interesting picture than opposites attracting.

Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt planned to watch The Sopranos on their first date. They arrived in sweatpants and oversized hoodies, put the show on for about five minutes, then spent four hours talking instead. Neither had been looking for a relationship when mutual friends encouraged them to meet in early 2025, they told Elite Daily. [1]

Their friends’ pitch was that they were essentially versions of each other. But the detail that makes the date appealing is less about being a perfect match than about not having to audition. Davidson said they were both tired of trying to impress people. The evening became memorable without either of them upgrading the plan. [1]

The Sonic trip came later. By their January 2026 interview, they were new parents: their daughter, Scottie, had arrived on December 12. Trying to get out of the house occasionally, they went to an escape room about 20 minutes away. On the way home, Davidson spotted a Sonic and got excited. They ordered an assortment of food, he made Hewitt laugh, and she decided to record him. [1]

Hewitt described the resulting video as messy; Davidson recalled their amusement at how thrilling a drive-through had become. That enthusiasm eventually earned them a paid partnership with the chain, which was also the context for the interview. Still, the sequence matters: this wasn’t their first date, and the planned activity wasn’t fast food. The stop became its own small event. [1]

The pickle delivery belongs in this story, too

There is another food story, from Hewitt’s pregnancy, that adds something to the picture. She told EndoTV that she had mentioned craving pickles to Davidson. He subsequently arrived with what she described as about 50 jars, in every variety. [2]

It was a light moment in a much heavier interview. Hewitt described years of painful periods, repeated misdiagnoses and learning to minimize what she felt. When the pain became unbearable, she researched specialists, found one who took it seriously and had surgery in late 2024. She wanted to discuss endometriosis publicly because other people were still going through what she had endured. [2]

That account gives Hewitt more dimension than the cheerful person filming a funny boyfriend. She spoke about taking pride in being physically and mentally strong, and about how difficult it could feel to acknowledge illness without hearing it as an admission of incapacity. Her openness included something uncomfortable, not just something entertaining. [2]

Pete Davidson. Photo: Greg2600 (CC BY-SA 2.0).
Pete Davidson. Photo: Greg2600, CC BY-SA 2.0. Original photo. Resized and converted to WebP; original photograph otherwise unaltered.

Similar taste, different ways of connecting

We compared Davidson’s INFP and Enneagram 7w6 profile with Hewitt’s ENFP and 2w3 profile using Figure Us Out. The worthwhile distinction isn’t that one is quiet and the other is outgoing. It is that two people can share an appetite for spontaneous, personal conversation while needing different amounts of space inside it.

For Davidson, the INFP lens emphasizes wanting an experience to feel personally right rather than impressive from the outside. It also makes room for someone who enjoys people but recovers through quieter time, and who may want to know what he thinks before saying it. A four-hour conversation doesn’t contradict that. Introversion is not a limit on how much someone can talk when the company feels easy. [1] [3]

His Enneagram Seven side adds a pull toward possibility, enjoyment and finding something to look forward to. The Six wing adds a wish for dependable company and reassurance. Together, that profile needn’t describe someone chasing ever-larger adventures. It can describe wanting a little fun with someone familiar. His excitement over the unplanned Sonic stop makes that version easier to picture, though the anecdote cannot settle his type. [1] [3]

Hewitt’s ENFP lens shares the interest in possibilities and room to change course, but puts more of the thinking into the exchange itself. Conversation can be how an idea becomes clear, not merely how a finished idea gets delivered. Her decision to capture their funny stop is compatible with that expressive streak: something enjoyable happens, and she wants to share it. [1]

The Two side of her profile brings attention to other people’s needs and a wish to be useful and connected. The Three wing adds concern with being capable and making that effort count. Hewitt’s wish to spare others the confusion she experienced gives the helping impulse a concrete context. Her account of struggling to acknowledge her own illness also raises a useful question for this profile: can someone who values being strong and helpful make equal room for needing help? That is a question the lens opens, not an explanation for her medical history. [2]

Four hours of talking doesn’t mean talking the same way

The comparison’s most useful strength is complementary pacing. In these profiles, Hewitt is more likely to discover a thought by talking, while Davidson is more likely to assemble it privately first. At their best, those tendencies can give a conversation both momentum and room: one person opens something up, the other has time to take it in and add something.

That only works if the roles remain flexible. Being quieter doesn’t automatically make someone a good listener, and being expressive doesn’t mean someone is taking over. The practical distinction is between silence that leaves room for an answer and silence that feels like an invitation to keep explaining. A reflective partner can make it clear that an answer is coming; a talk-it-through partner can let that pause stand. Neither needs to become the permanent audience.

Their first-date account doesn’t reveal who spoke more, who paused or how they handle difficult conversations. What it does establish is that they both wanted to keep talking long after the television had become irrelevant. The personality comparison makes that more interesting, not less: ease doesn’t require identical conversational habits. [1]

Expression With Room to Listen

Expression With Room to Listen: an illustrative pattern
Read the diagram in words
  1. Elsie Hewitt puts a thought or experience into words that invite a response.
  2. Pete Davidson takes in the account and offers a considered question, reflection, or addition.
  3. The conversation gains both expression and reception when the speaking role remains available to each person.

Connections: step 1 → step 3; step 2 → step 3.

Follow the arrows to see how these responses connect.

Parenthood has made their nights out rarer, they said, but their latest date story still has something in common with the first. They set out to do one thing, and the part they remembered was what happened around it. First, The Sopranos lost out to four hours of conversation. Later, an escape-room trip acquired corndogs, milkshakes and a video Hewitt couldn’t resist making because Davidson was making her laugh. [1]

Published by Figure Us Out with AI assistance. Find the sources and further reading below. About the founders.

Sources and further reading (3)

The Figure Us Out personality breakdown

Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt: their personalities, side by side

We used Figure Us Out to compare the profiles below and explore how their personalities might work together.

These are estimates from public information, not assessments they completed. The comparisons show personality tendencies and possible patterns, not a verdict on their relationship.

The personality types behind this comparison

Pete Davidson

INFP · Enneagram 7w6

Usually recovers alone; easy company is occasionally welcome. Usually wants the concept before the detailed example. Leans toward possible solutions while acknowledging the feeling.

Elsie Hewitt

ENFP · Enneagram 2w3

Usually feels renewed by connecting with people. Usually wants the concept before the detailed example. Leans toward hearing the feeling while making some room for solutions.

● Pete Davidson◆ Elsie Hewitt
Six everyday preferences Clockwise from the top: Solitude to Social, Examples to Concepts, Wing it to Plan it, Think quietly to Think aloud, Comfort to Solutions, and Move on to Fine-tune. A position closer to an outside word leans toward that preference. The middle ring means a balance between the two preferences. The center is empty. Neither endpoint is better, and shape size and overlap are not compatibility scores. Names in the legend identify the solid blue line with circles and the dashed rust line with diamonds. The scales below describe each person’s preferences. Solitude Social Examples Concepts Wing it Plan it Think quietly Think aloud Comfort Solutions Move on Fine-tune
Six everyday preferences at a glance. Read each spoke from the centre outward; the comparisons below explain the differences. More overlap does not mean a better relationship.

How their everyday preferences compare

See where these profiles line up and where they take different approaches. Neither end of a scale is better.

Recharging

Time aloneTime with people
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Usually recovers alone; easy company is occasionally welcome.

Elsie Hewitt: Usually feels renewed by connecting with people.

Learning something new

Start with an exampleStart with the big idea
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Usually wants the concept before the detailed example.

Elsie Hewitt: Usually wants the concept before the detailed example.

Following your curiosity

Dig into one subjectExplore many subjects
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Usually follows several interests rather than staying with just one.

Elsie Hewitt: Usually follows several interests rather than staying with just one.

Making plans

Keep options openDecide ahead
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Usually leaves many decisions until closer to the moment.

Elsie Hewitt: Leans toward keeping room to decide later.

Changing plans

Keep the existing planTake the better opening
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Usually welcomes switching to a more appealing alternative.

Elsie Hewitt: Usually welcomes switching to a more appealing alternative.

Variety and routine

Enjoy the familiar rhythmWant more variety
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Usually wants noticeable variation across ordinary days.

Elsie Hewitt: Leans toward variety while keeping a few familiar anchors.

Finding your words

Think before speakingThink by talking
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Usually pauses until the thought is reasonably clear.

Elsie Hewitt: Usually discovers the idea through speaking it aloud.

Getting to the point

Ease into the pointSay it plainly
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Leans toward a softened opening before a clear statement.

Elsie Hewitt: Leans toward a softened opening before a clear statement.

The support you offer

Hear the feelingWork on the problem
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Leans toward possible solutions while acknowledging the feeling.

Elsie Hewitt: Leans toward hearing the feeling while making some room for solutions.

The support you want

Listen and understandHelp me solve it
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Leans toward being heard while welcoming some practical thinking.

Elsie Hewitt: Leans toward being heard while welcoming some practical thinking.

Feeling understood

The main idea is enoughThe nuance matters
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Usually needs a fairly nuanced understanding before feeling satisfied.

Elsie Hewitt: Usually needs a fairly nuanced understanding before feeling satisfied.

Personal decisions

Work them out togetherKeep the final say
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Leans toward personal authority with limited consultation.

Elsie Hewitt: Usually welcomes substantial shared input into a personal choice.

Knowing when it is done

Good enough for its purposeKeep refining
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Balances practical completion with useful refinement.

Elsie Hewitt: Leans toward another refinement pass when it will improve the result.

When to talk it through

Take time firstTalk now
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Leans toward some processing time before discussion.

Elsie Hewitt: Leans toward talking soon rather than carrying the uncertainty.

Receiving feedback

Encourage me firstGive me the specifics
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Appreciates encouragement and clear detail together.

Elsie Hewitt: Appreciates encouragement and clear detail together.

Finding your way back

Find warmth againUnderstand what happened
Pete Davidson
Elsie Hewitt

Pete Davidson: Values renewed warmth and a clear understanding together.

Elsie Hewitt: Leans toward warmth with a little clarification.

Where they could work well together

These combinations suggest ways their different contributions could help each other.

Expression With Room to Listen

A conversation may benefit from one person opening a thread and the other giving it room to develop. Elsie Hewitt can make internal ideas available for connection. Pete Davidson can bring a reflective response that adds something after the thought has been heard. The possible advantage is complementary pacing, not a permanent talker-listener assignment. Elsie Hewitt puts a thought or experience into words that invite a response. Pete Davidson takes in the account and offers a considered question, reflection, or addition. The conversation gains both expression and reception when the speaking role remains available to each person. The quieter contribution is not automatically better listening, and a more expressive contribution is not automatically dominance. The strength works when the listener is allowed to speak and the speaker can make room. Taking turns preserves the advantage without converting it into unequal conversational labor.

Elsie Hewitt

Elsie Hewitt puts a thought or experience into words that invite a response.

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson takes in the account and offers a considered question, reflection, or addition.

Together

The conversation gains both expression and reception when the speaking role remains available to each person.

Making the most of it

After an opening account, ask what the other person noticed, then deliberately make room for their own thread.

A Conversation That Keeps Opening

You may find that a good question is an enjoyable way to spend time together, even when neither of they has an answer. One thought opens another, and disagreement can add something interesting rather than end the exchange. The connection comes from wanting to explore, not from needing identical opinions or interests. Pete Davidson brings an observation or question that invites more than a quick answer. Elsie Hewitt develops the thought and offers another connection rather than closing it immediately. The exchange becomes a shared source of discovery, with each contribution giving the other something fresh to explore. A conversation like this can stay unfinished and still have been worthwhile. You might follow a curious observation, examine why people see something differently, or discover an unexpected connection between their interests. Keep that freedom separate from decisions that need an answer: wondering together is the pleasure here, not a requirement to make every practical choice more complicated.

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson brings an observation or question that invites more than a quick answer.

Elsie Hewitt

Elsie Hewitt develops the thought and offers another connection rather than closing it immediately.

Together

The exchange becomes a shared source of discovery, with each contribution giving the other something fresh to explore.

Making the most of it

Bring one interesting question to shared downtime and let it develop without needing to produce a conclusion.

Encouragement That Names Something Specific

A specific observation can be more encouraging than a large prediction. Elsie Hewitt may enjoy noticing what another person could build on and putting it into words. Pete Davidson may find that useful when the observation offers a starting point rather than a new expectation. The opportunity is encouragement that helps someone choose, not encouragement that chooses for them. Elsie Hewitt names a specific quality or effort that seems relevant to a possible next step. Pete Davidson can consider that observation as information rather than a requirement to prove it. The encouragement can support a freely chosen experiment because it points to something concrete without promising success. Keep the observation small enough to be recognizable: something in the way a person approached a task, asked a question, or expressed an interest. Then leave the next step open. The recipient can use the suggestion, reshape it, or simply appreciate being noticed. That room to choose is what keeps encouragement from becoming another demand to demonstrate potential.

Elsie Hewitt

Elsie Hewitt names a specific quality or effort that seems relevant to a possible next step.

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson can consider that observation as information rather than a requirement to prove it.

Together

The encouragement can support a freely chosen experiment because it points to something concrete without promising success.

Making the most of it

Name the quality, the specific occasion that showed it, and an optional possibility rather than a prediction.

Where misunderstandings could start

A small difference can become a repeating pattern when each person’s response prompts more of the other’s. Here are possibilities suggested by these profiles.

Filling the Pause

A pause can feel like room to think or a gap that needs filling. Elsie Hewitt may continue speaking to keep a conversation moving, especially when silence seems uncertain. Pete Davidson may be using precisely that silence to assemble a response. More explanation can therefore delay the answer it is meant to help. Imagine Elsie Hewitt finishes a thought and Pete Davidson pauses before answering. Elsie Hewitt interprets the pause as uncertainty or disengagement and adds another explanation. Pete Davidson takes in the new material and postpones the response that was beginning to form. Elsie Hewitt hears more silence and offers another example to make the point clearer. Pete Davidson now has more to process and less opportunity to claim a speaking turn. The growing silence persuades Elsie Hewitt that further explanation is needed, so the conversational space keeps shrinking. This is a turn-taking problem rather than evidence that either person wants less closeness. The person waiting needs to make reflection visible; the person talking needs to let that signal buy real silence. Neither should have to compete for an opening by becoming louder or faster.

Elsie Hewitt

Elsie Hewitt interprets the pause as uncertainty or disengagement and adds another explanation.

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson takes in the new material and postpones the response that was beginning to form.

Elsie Hewitt

Elsie Hewitt hears more silence and offers another example to make the point clearer.

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson now has more to process and less opportunity to claim a speaking turn.

Elsie Hewitt

The growing silence persuades Elsie Hewitt that further explanation is needed, so the conversational space keeps shrinking.

↩ This can bring them back to the start of the same pattern.

Something that could help

Agree that a spoken request for thinking time will be followed by a real pause.

Fitting In or Feeling True

Adapting to a situation can feel considerate and effective, or it can feel like losing a truthful part of themselves. Elsie Hewitt may attend to how a choice will be received. Pete Davidson may attend to whether the choice still feels personally real. Each can interpret the other's concern as sacrificing something important. Imagine they are deciding how to present a shared idea or preference to other people. Elsie Hewitt suggests a more acceptable or polished version to help the interaction succeed. Pete Davidson hears pressure to make the expression less genuine and defends the original version. Elsie Hewitt sees the defense as ignoring foreseeable social consequences and pushes for more adjustment. Pete Davidson feels authenticity becoming negotiable and insists more strongly on the unaltered expression. The stronger insistence makes Elsie Hewitt more concerned about reception, prompting another attempt to shape the presentation. The question is not whether one person is fake or the other is socially unaware. It is which adjustments change only the delivery and which change the meaning. Naming the part that must remain true can leave room for tact without turning the whole conversation into a choice between belonging and authenticity.

Elsie Hewitt

Elsie Hewitt suggests a more acceptable or polished version to help the interaction succeed.

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson hears pressure to make the expression less genuine and defends the original version.

Elsie Hewitt

Elsie Hewitt sees the defense as ignoring foreseeable social consequences and pushes for more adjustment.

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson feels authenticity becoming negotiable and insists more strongly on the unaltered expression.

Elsie Hewitt

The stronger insistence makes Elsie Hewitt more concerned about reception, prompting another attempt to shape the presentation.

↩ This can bring them back to the start of the same pattern.

Something that could help

Preserve the intended meaning while negotiating the form of expression.

Help That Crowds Out Ownership

Help can reduce effort while also changing who gets to own the task. Elsie Hewitt may see a useful intervention and offer it immediately. Pete Davidson may care as much about doing the thing independently as about getting it done. Neither intention is obvious from the intervention alone. Imagine Pete Davidson is working out how to do something unfamiliar and Elsie Hewitt spots a shortcut. Elsie Hewitt steps in with instructions or starts doing part of the task to make things easier. Pete Davidson experiences the intervention as reduced confidence in their ability and pushes the help away. Elsie Hewitt notices the resistance and explains more forcefully why the proposed help would work. Pete Davidson protects ownership more firmly because accepting now feels like surrendering the task. The unfinished difficulty looks more avoidable to Elsie Hewitt, increasing the impulse to step in again. This is not a test of who is more competent. The unasked question is whether the immediate goal is assistance, learning, or independent control. Offering a choice before intervening allows help to remain help instead of becoming a contest over who gets to decide.

Elsie Hewitt

Elsie Hewitt steps in with instructions or starts doing part of the task to make things easier.

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson experiences the intervention as reduced confidence in their ability and pushes the help away.

Elsie Hewitt

Elsie Hewitt notices the resistance and explains more forcefully why the proposed help would work.

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson protects ownership more firmly because accepting now feels like surrendering the task.

Elsie Hewitt

The unfinished difficulty looks more avoidable to Elsie Hewitt, increasing the impulse to step in again.

↩ This can bring them back to the start of the same pattern.

Something that could help

Keep task ownership with the person doing it unless they explicitly hand it over.

Celebrity Match

Try Celebrity Match

Try these two, or choose any two celebrities below. See how their personalities compare.

Choose a celebrity

Need an idea?

Browse all names